food news


What Really Makes You Ill

What Really Makes You Ill
10 Dec 2022 | 1:12 pm

More about ‘Strep A’ – What is going on?

The number of children's deaths attributed to 'Strep A' in the UK is reported to have reached 9. However, a BBC article dated 8th December entitled GPs say parents need clearer strep A advice states that,

"Since September, 15 UK children have died after invasive strep A infections."

The article also states that,

"There have also been 47 deaths from strep A in adults in England."

The obvious question is: Why has this information not been reported in all of the recent media stories about 'strep A'?

One response to this question might be that the 'would-be controllers' have decided to include data that is not so recent in order to ramp up the level of fear in the minds of the public. But it is strange that deaths as the result of 'Strep A' are still only reported to be occurring in the UK.

However, although no new deaths have been reported during the past few days, there are media stories about increasing numbers of 'cases' of 'invasive Strep'; this story is clearly far from over!

It is important to point out that 'cases' of so-called 'Strep A infection' are not exclusive to the UK, they are also claimed to occur in other countries, including the US. It is therefore unsurprising that there is information about 'Strep A' on the CDC website. This can be found on a web page dated 7th December entitled Possible Increase in Invasive Group A Strep Infections, 2022 that states,

"CDC is looking into a possible increase in invasive group A strep (iGAS) infections among children in the United States. iGAS infections include necrotizing fasciitis and streptococcal toxic shock syndrome."

Is it possible that we will soon see reports about deaths due to 'Strep A', and especially iGAS, occurring in the US or other countries too?

So what are the reasons for this surge in so-called 'Strep A infections'?

Flu Vaccination

According to the UK Government web page entitled Flu vaccination programme 2022 to 2023: briefing for primary schools,

"This autumn term all primary school-aged children in England (from Reception class to Year 6) will be offered a flu vaccination by the NHS school-aged immunisation service."

Note the term 'offered'. On the same web page, under the heading Further Information, is the revealing and extremely important answer to the question Can parents or guardians refuse to have their child vaccinated?

"Yes, the vaccination is not mandatory. Parents or guardians will be asked to give their informed consent for the vaccination."

This means that some children will not have received the flu vaccine.

Although it is inadvisable to assert that the flu vaccine has caused child deaths without irrefutable evidence, the ingredients of this vaccine cannot be described as 'benign'.

The NHS web page entitled Children's flu vaccine provides some information. However, further information can be obtained from a link on that page to the PDF of the Package leaflet, which ought to be essential reading for parents prior to deciding whether their children should receive the vaccine – or not.

The vaccine ingredients are listed on page 4 of the package insert under the heading Contents of the pack and other information. The first set of ingredients include the alleged 'virus', which is claimed to be 'live attenuated' and comprised of four strains. These so-called 'viruses' are however the least of people's concerns because they have never been proven to be pathogenic.

The components of the vaccine that many parents may like to be aware of include:

  • The fact that the 'viruses' are said to have been 'propagated in fertilised hens' eggs'
  • The fact that the viruses are also claimed to have been 'produced in VERO cells by reverse genetic technology. This product contains genetically modified organisms (GMOs)'
  • Other ingredients include gelatine (porcine)

I would suggest that this information is extremely important, but particularly so for people who are either vegetarian or vegan and also for people whose religious beliefs prevent them from eating pigs and who would therefore object to being injected with porcine-based gelatine.

The package insert states that a rash is one of the uncommon 'side effects' of the vaccine. Interestingly, a rash is one of the symptoms of 'Strep A infection'. Could this be a coincidence? I very much doubt it. But that does not mean that a rash would be solely due to the vaccine. The flu vaccine is not the only factor to consider with respect to children's health problems, whatever label is being attached to their symptoms.

There are other factors that must be also considered and they, of course, include any pharmaceutical 'medicines', some of which may have been administered in the early days of the child's illness.


The treatment most commonly offered for 'Strep A' includes antibiotics such as penicillin or amoxicillin.

The seriousness of the current situation has led to suggestions that antibiotics should also be prescribed prophylactically, as indicated by a BBC article entitled Strep A schools may be given preventive antibiotics. At the time of writing, this is still only being considered as an 'option' – fortunately.

Strangely though, despite the fact that antibiotics are not yet being recommended as a preventive measure, reports have circulated that the UK is facing a penicillin shortage, as indicated by a 5th December article entitled UK faces penicillin shortages until end of December amid Strep A outbreak as parents scramble to find drugs to fight off bug that has killed SEVEN children so far.

Yet this is refuted by a 7th December BBC article entitled Antibiotics for Strep A in good supply, says health secretary Steve Barclay.

This raises the question of why the media are reporting contradictory information? The most likely answer is to keep the public, and especially the parents of young children, in a continual state of fear.

New Vaccine?

Unsurprisingly, many people have suggested, quite reasonably, that all of this fear-mongering about a new deadly disease is to usher in a new vaccine in record time for which the public, and especially parents of young children, will be extremely grateful. The media are clearly promoting this view, as can be seen by an article entitled Strep A vaccine is 'desperately needed', Government adviser claims, which states that,

"…Strep A had been neglected in terms of vaccine development."

The evidence does not, however, appear to support this claim that 'Strep A' has been neglected, because there have been attempts to manufacture a Strep A vaccine for many decades, as can be seen by a June 2020 article entitled Update on Group A Streptococcal Vaccine Development, which states that,

"Strep A vaccine development has been ongoing for decades."

The article provides many details about efforts over the decades to produce such a vaccine.

In addition, a webpage dated September 2015 on the website of NIAID is entitled Group A Streptococcus Vaccine research and states,

"NIAID supports research to develop a group A streptococcus vaccine, and several candidate vaccines are in various phases of development. While some scientists are conducting animal model studies to obtain data to pursue clinical trials in humans, other scientists are close to evaluating group A streptococcus vaccine candidates in Phase I clinical trials."

The research that seems to be winning the race to develop a vaccine is reported on the University of Alberta website that contains a page entitled Researchers launch clinical trial for strep A vaccine. This web page is dated 25th November; it therefore pre-dates the first reported deaths in the UK due to the recent alleged 'outbreak' of 'Strep A' by a few days, which is an extremely interesting 'coincidence'. The web page states,

"An international collaboration involving researchers at the University of Alberta and Griffith University in Australia has launched the first phase of human clinical trials for a potential strep A vaccine."

The page continues,

"The objective of this Phase 1 clinical trial, which Richer estimates will include 10 to 20 patients, is to first demonstrate safety, and then efficacy. If successful, the Li Ka Shing Applied Virology Institute plans to support Phase 2 trials, which involve a larger number of patients."

This vaccine is obviously not yet ready for release onto the market, but it is clear that Strep A vaccine development has not been 'neglected'.

These different media reports would seem to indicate that there is a concerted effort to encourage the public to be more vociferous in their demand for the vaccine industry to speed up their research and bring a vaccine to market as quickly as possible. This does not mean of course that this is what the public is actually demanding; the media will merely create the perception that this is the case and encourage people to believe that this is what 'the public' is demanding.

For anyone who is not aware that the purpose of the media is to control what people think, I would recommend reading Propaganda by Edward Bernays, which contains this frequently cited quote,

"We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of."

As has been repeatedly stated, vaccines do not prevent 'infections' because so-called 'germs' are not pathogens, they do not infect the body and cause disease. This is particularly important to understand with respect to bacteria because they are normal inhabitants of the body; they are not invaders.

Autoimmune Diseases

Interestingly, the streptococcus bacterium has been associated with cardiac problems that are labelled as 'autoimmune diseases'. For example, a page entitled Causes of Autoimmune Diseases on the Johns Hopkins Medicine website states,

"Perhaps the best example of molecular mimicry is that between the M proteins of the group A Streptococcus pyogenes and the myosin form expressed in heart valves. Recurrent throat infections with this bacterium cause the development of antibodies and CD4 T cells directed against the streptococcal M proteins that accidentally cross-react with myosin expressed in the cardiac valves. This self-reactivity is believed to ultimately lead to detrimental immune pathology (in this case, the chronic valvular disease known as rheumatic heart disease)."

Note the use of the word 'believed'.

The label 'autoimmune disease' is, however, a misnomer. It has never been proven that the body produces 'antibodies' that attack the body's own cells and tissues 'by mistake'. The idea that this is the case demonstrates a serious lack of understanding by the medical establishment about how the body really functions.

Interestingly, the medical establishment actually admits that they do not know what causes autoimmune diseases, as stated on the same web page under the heading, Much Remains to Be Learned,

"For the most part, we still do not know what causes an autoimmune disease."

The reason for including in this article a discussion about autoimmune diseases, is to raise the question of whether the streptococcus bacterium is going to be made the scapegoat for increased morbidity and mortality in young children due to heart problems.

If so, this will of course, generate a preponderance of media propaganda stories to stimulate the idea of a desperate urgency for the development of a vaccine against this alleged 'killer' bacterium.

It is therefore important for people to understand that bacteria are not pathogenic; and that there are many reasons that people experience symptoms, none of which are the result of any 'bacterial infection'.

More Lockdowns?

It is a tragedy of immense proportions that even a single child has died. But this situation does raise the question: Why have the mainstream media not been equally vociferous about the thousands of people, especially young children, who have died as the result of the 'Covid' injection? Where is their outrage at these deaths?

It is clear there are reasons for the emphasis on this alleged 'disease'.

This all leads to the question: Is it possible that the UK is to be used as the 'testbed' for new lockdowns to prevent the 'spread' of this allegedly dangerous disease?

It is for this reason that people need to be aware that whatever is causing illness and death, it has nothing whatsoever to do with any allegedly 'pathogenic bacterium'; this theory remains unproven.

In his book, Food is Your Best Medicine, Dr Henry Bieler explains one of the key functions of bacteria,

"After the cells have been damaged by toxic wastes, it is easy for bacteria, as scavengers, to attack and devour the weakened, injured and dead cells."

Bacteria are not our enemies to be fought with toxic vaccines or toxic antibiotics; on the contrary, they are essential for life and need to be preserved, not killed.

Dawn Lester
10th December 2022


GPs say parents need clearer strep A advice

Possible Increase in Invasive Group A Strep Infections, 2022

Flu vaccination programme 2022 to 2023: briefing for primary schools

Children's Flu vaccine

Flu vaccine information leaflet

Strep A schools may be given preventive antibiotics

UK faces penicillin shortages until end of December amid Strep A outbreak as parents scramble to find drugs to fight off bug that has killed SEVEN children so far

Antibiotics for Strep A in good supply, says health secretary Steve Barclay

Strep A vaccine is 'desperately needed', Government adviser claims

Update on Group A Streptococcal Vaccine Development – 2020

Group A Streptococcus Vaccine Research – 2015

Researchers launch clinical trial for strep A vaccine

Causes of Autoimmune Diseases

The post More about 'Strep A' – What is going on? appeared first on What Really Makes You Ill.

What Really Makes You Ill
5 Dec 2022 | 5:50 pm

A new bacterial disease? No, it’s just more fearmongering

In the past few days there have been a number of media reports about a new potentially dangerous 'disease', although at the moment it seems to be confined to the UK, as can be seen by a 2nd December BBC article entitled Six children die with Strep A bacterial infection that states,

"Six children have died with an invasive condition caused by Strep A – including five under 10-year-olds in England since September – the UK Health Security Agency has said."

It would seem therefore that the fearmongering narrative about 'pathogenic viruses' has now been expanded to include 'pathogenic bacteria'. But bacteria are no more to blame for disease than 'viruses', even though, unlike the particles called 'viruses', bacteria definitely exist and can be observed.

For anyone new to the idea that bacteria and 'viruses' are not pathogenic please read,


These new media reports raise an important question: Have the 'would-be controllers' just moved the goalposts for those of us who have been calling out the 'virus' lie for almost 3 years?

Other questions that also spring to mind include: What is this all about? And why is this situation only occurring in the UK?

The latest details, as at the time of writing, are reported by the BBC in a 3rd December article entitled Parents urged to be aware of Strep A symptoms after death of six children which states that,

"Strep A infections are usually mild, causing illness ranging from a sore throat to scarlet fever, but can develop into a more serious invasive Group A Strep (iGAS) infection."

Further explanations about this so-called 'infection' are provided in the same article under the heading, What Is Strep A?

  • Group A streptococcal (GAS) infection is caused by strains of the streptococcus pyogenes bacterium
  • The bacteria can live on hands or the throat for long enough to allow easy spread between people through sneezing, kissing and skin contact
  • Most infections cause mild illnesses such as "strep throat" or skin infections
  • It can also cause scarlet fever and in the majority of cases this clears up with antibiotics
  • On rare occasions the bacteria can get deeper into the body – including infecting the lungs and bloodstream. It is known as invasive GAS (iGAS) and needs urgent treatment as this can be serious and life-threatening

There are so many problems with these claims!!

First of all, streptococcus bacteria are found in healthy people, a fact that is admitted by the medical establishment, as stated by a 2nd December BBC article entitled What is Strep A and what are the symptoms to look out for? under the heading What is Strep A?

"It's a bacteria sometimes found in the throat or on the skin.
Many people carry it harmlessly without even knowing, but they can spread it to others who might become ill."

Although it might sound like nit-picking, the author of the article has used the plural form, bacteria, rather than the singular form, bacterium. Her sentence should have started 'It's a bacterium….' This is an error a 'health editor', as the article author is claimed to be, should not have made.

More to the point though, is the admission that this bacterium can be harmless and may not always cause 'disease'. This situation completely undermines the claim that the streptococcus bacterium is pathogenic because it fails to meet the first of Koch's Postulates, which states that the 'microbe' alleged to be the causal agent should always be found in people suffering from the disease it is claimed to cause, and should never be found in people who do not have the disease it is claimed to cause.

The logic of this Postulate is undeniable. Yet it is admitted that 'strep', and indeed many other bacteria, can be found in people who are asymptomatic, which means that they do not have a 'disease'.

A single exception to any 'rule' refutes the notion that it is a 'rule'.

Furthermore, the existence of a single exception to a 'rule' means, at the very least, that the 'rule' need to be re-examined and re-assessed. But more importantly, when the 'rule' is discovered to not be supported by evidence, then it needs to be abandoned and replaced with a 'rule' that can be shown to be supported by evidence.

Unfortunately, the medical establishment refuses to re-examine its rules with respect to the 'germ theory'. Instead, they make ridiculous excuses for any exceptions to their ideas about 'infectious diseases'; one excuse, for example, is that people who are 'asymptomatic carriers' have strong immune systems. This is simply an assumption, and one that has never been proven to be true mainly because the concept of the 'immune system' is totally dependent on the 'germ theory', which itself remains unproven.

One of the main consequences of the idea that bacteria are the causes of these health problems, is that the recommended 'solution' is to prescribe antibiotics, which, by their very nature, are toxic; their intended purpose is to kill the bacteria.

It is asserted that the most appropriate antibiotic for Strep A is penicillin on the basis that it is said to not be affected by antimicrobial resistance. This is yet another mistaken notion, but one that distracts from the fundamental issue, which is that bacteria have not been proven to be pathogenic.

What is particularly worrying, however, is the reference to the more serious condition called 'invasive GAS' that is described on the Minnesota Department of Health web page entitled About Group A Streptococcus: Commonly Asked Questions, which states, under the heading What Kind of Illness are Caused by Group A Streptococcal Infection?

"Two of the most severe, but least common, forms of invasive GAS disease are called "necrotizing fasciitis" and "streptococcal toxic shock syndrome" (STSS)."

Necrotising fasciitis is described as,

"…a destructive infection of muscle and fat tissue, and occasionally described by the media as the "flesh eating" bacteria."

STSS is described as

"…a rapidly progressing infection that causes shock and injury to internal organs such as the liver, kidneys and lungs."

It is obvious that these are very serious conditions, but they cannot be properly investigated and understood whilst the medical establishment continues to declare them to be the result of 'bacterial infections'.

Unfortunately, without a serious and in-depth investigation into each individual case, it is impossible to know exactly what the causes could be, because there are always multiple factors involved in the causation of health problems. However, it is highly likely that 'toxins' of some description are involved, especially in the case of STSS, which involves damage to the liver and kidneys, two of the body's most important elimination organs.

It is important to note this statement in the 3rd December BBC article,

"The rise in Strep A cases and deaths is most likely due to high amounts of the bacteria circulating and increased social mixing, the UKHSA said."

There are reasons for the presence of 'high amounts of bacteria'. Within the natural world bacteria are recognised to be decomposers of dead and dying material; they perform the same role within the human body. Therefore, when the body is damaged, often as the result of exposures to toxins, there is a need for increased bacterial activity to process and eliminate the dead and dying material.

There are a number of possible 'toxins' to which people, including children, have been recently exposed at levels that are higher than normal. The main candidate on this list of toxins is, of course, the so-called 'Covid vaccine'. Although not the only 'toxin', it certainly needs to be considered as an important factor when investigating the cases of what are being labelled 'Strep A infection'.

So the question remains: What is the real purpose of these new media stories?

It's obvious that there is an agenda to keep people in fear of 'dangerous diseases'. But it is also important to note the reference in the article to the rise of cases being due to 'increased social mixing'. This leads to some pretty obvious questions: Are they preparing for the implementation of further lockdowns to 'stop the spread' of this new allegedly 'bacterial' disease? And is the UK to be the 'testing ground' to see how compliant people will be?

The purpose of all of this will no doubt make itself known at some stage, but my hope is that sufficient numbers of people have already realised the extent to which they have been lied to and will recognise that these new stories are just more lies intended to keep us all in a state of fear.

As Mahatma Gandhi is quoted to have said,

"An error does not become truth by reason of multiplied propagation, nor does truth become error because nobody sees it."

No matter how often the medical establishment attempts to propagandise people with fear-based stories about 'dangerous pathogens' that cause 'deadly diseases', it is vitally important for people to know that there is no genuine scientific evidence, and there never has been, that bacteria and 'viruses' are the causes of any disease.

Dawn Lester
5th December 2022


Six children die with Strep A bacterial infection

Parents urged to be aware of Strep A symptoms after death of six children

What is Strep A and what are the symptoms to look out for?

About Group A Streptococcus: Commonly Asked Questions

The post A new bacterial disease? No, it's just more fearmongering appeared first on What Really Makes You Ill.

What Really Makes You Ill
26 Oct 2022 | 11:47 am

Disease Madness – What is Happening? Part 3

In parts 1 and 2 of this series, I discussed the complete lack of evidence for the existence of 'pathogenic agents' of any description and the efforts of the medical establishment to promote vaccines as the only way to prevent what are erroneously referred to as 'infectious diseases'.

In this 3rd and final part of the series, I will expand the discussion to include a few of the other aspects of the 'agenda' as exemplified by the UN document entitled The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, also known as the 2030 Agenda or 'Global Goals'. Although published in 2015, the 2030 Agenda does not represent a new 'plan'; instead, it is best described as an updated and extended version of previous 'plans'; especially Agenda 21.

It is important for people to recognise that these grandiose 'plans' have a very specific purpose, which is to persuade everyone that 'intervention' is absolutely essential and that the proposed measures, which are based on the findings of various 'experts', possess the ability to genuinely solve all our problems. It is therefore essential for the planners that everyone believes in their 'plans' and agrees to and supports the implementation of the proposed interventions.

The words used in these documents are therefore carefully crafted, almost invariably with the assistance of behavioural psychologists, to ensure their maximum impact on the general public. It is essential to the 'would-be-controllers' that people are left with the impression that the aims and goals of the 'agenda' are the most humane, benevolent and philanthropic that anyone could ever create; as can be seen by the Preamble to the 2030 Agenda document which states that,

"This Agenda is a plan of action for people, planet and prosperity."

But in this instance, appearances are most definitely deceptive. A more in-depth examination of the document and the associated plans will demonstrate to the reader that the proposed actions will not solve the world's problems, nor will they be of any benefit to 'people, planet and prosperity'.

They will of course be of benefit to some people, but they are only very few in number by comparison to the vast number of people who will be negatively impacted by the proposed measures.

It is essential to appreciate that problems can only be solved by addressing their root cause(s). However, it is abundantly clear that the recommendations of the designated 'experts' do not address root causes, which means that they will inevitably fail to solve the problems they are intended to address. Instead, the proposed measures can be shown to support a narrative that has been created for a specific reason, but that reason is not for the purposes of genuinely solving the world's problems.

This can best be demonstrated by the example of the narrative relating to the alleged 'Covid-19 pandemic' that was claimed to affect everyone, everywhere, and was used to justify the most draconian measures in almost every country throughout the world. Yet, as has been repeatedly discussed, there is no evidence for the existence of any 'pathogenic virus', despite proclamations to the contrary by a large number of so-called 'experts' from various fields within science, although mainly from the field of virology, the fundamental problems with which have been discussed in other articles.

But 'Covid-19' is by no means the only so-called 'infectious disease' being used to scare people and coerce them into accepting medical interventions, especially vaccines. There are reports that claim we are going to experience even more and even worse 'outbreaks' of 'infectious diseases' that are due to a variety of different factors. Although it was cited in part 1 of the series, it is useful to refer again to the 27th June article entitled Could 'Disease X' be just around the corner? Top professor warns Britain needs to 'strengthen' its preparations for possibility of a new pandemic amid outbreak of Covid, Monkeypox and Polio in the UK, which states that,

"The factors behind the spread of new and existing viruses are likely due to growing economies of previously undeveloped nations, population growth, rise in the trade in wildlife and the human movement into jungles and forests."

It's important to note the attempt to deride the efforts of developing countries to develop and 'grow their economies' and to demonise 'population growth'. These factors have absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with 'disease', but they must be promoted as if 'dangerous', so that people will accept the proposed measures to curtail such activities; as encapsulated within the SDGs (Sustainable Development Goals) of the 2030 Agenda!

In addition, there is a clear emphasis on 'diseases' that are claimed to have a higher incidence in countries within Africa, especially sub-Saharan Africa. It is for this reason that organisations such as GAVI and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation target their efforts on 'poor African children' on the basis of the unsubstantiated claim that they need 'life-saving vaccines'. Sadly, a large proportion of people believe that these efforts represent genuine philanthropy.

The reason for emphasising these points is to highlight the efforts by 'vested interests', also referred to as the 'globalists' or the 'would-be controllers', to introduce as many interventions as possible to control the lives of everyone, everywhere, no matter how remote their location, under the guise of being able to achieve the aims of the SDGs with respect to issues such as: poverty, reproduction, food production and agriculture, industry and development water and sanitation, to name just a few.

These topics are covered in some detail in chapter 8 of our book, What Really Makes You Ill? Why Everything You Thought You Knew About Disease Is Wrong, but a few are briefly discussed below to demonstrate how all-encompassing these interventions can be.


According to the September 2019 WHO Fact sheet entitled Maternal mortality,

"Maternal mortality is unacceptably high. About 295 000 women died during and following pregnancy and childbirth in 2017."

This is followed by the claim that more than 90% of these deaths occurred in 'lower and lower-middle income countries'. In other words, poor women are more likely to die as the result of pregnancy or childbirth. The 'solution' for this perceived problem will, as always, involve interventions in the name of 'healthcare', as the fact sheet indicates,

"Poor women in remote areas are the least likely to receive adequate health care. This is especially true for regions with low numbers of skilled health workers, such as sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia."

The problem with this statement is that it ignores the obvious fact that women everywhere have been giving birth without the interventions of 'modern medicine' for many thousands if not millions of years. In fact, modern medicine has an extremely poor track record of delivering 'healthcare', as demonstrated by the well-known phenomenon of 'iatrogenesis'.

Although 'population control' and 'genocide' are controversial topics, there are recorded efforts to curtail reproduction in order to limit population growth rates, especially in certain regions of the world, such as sub-Saharan Africa. These efforts can be shown to date back to at least the 1970s; one example is a 1974 document entitled Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for US Security and Overseas Threats. This document, also known as NSSM 200 or sometimes the Kissinger Report, indicates that 'assistance' should be provided,

"…to the largest and fastest growing developing countries where there is special US political and strategic interest."

It also indicates that this assistance should be provided through USAID programmes, including education programmes for women in 'developing' countries to inform them about various issues, such as limiting their family size through different methods of birth control. Importantly, the NSSM 200 makes the revealing comment that,

"Bilateral population assistance is the largest and most invisible 'instrument' for carrying out US policy in this area."

It should be obvious that 'US policy' should not be created in order to have an impact on the decisions of people in other countries about how many children they should or should not have, or even whether they should have children.

Food production and Agriculture

Another idea that is used as a basis for gaining greater control over people's lives is that there is, or soon will be, insufficient food available to feed the ever-growing world population. At the time of writing, this is becoming an even more important issue due to increasing reports about imminent food shortages.

It is important to point out that I am not denying that people suffer from hunger and even die as the result of starvation, but I am disputing the reasons given for this situation, the main one of which is that the Earth does not have the ability to provide sufficient food to feed the growing world population.

The topic of 'food security' was discussed in Agenda 21 and carried forward into the 2030 Agenda, especially in SDG 2.4 that refers to 'sustainable food production systems'. One of the problems with this is that it refers to producing food rather than growing food. The production of 'manufactured food products' functions within a very centralised system and leaves the control and distribution of food in the hands of the owners of the multinational corporations that manufacture the 'food products'. The problems with and consequences of this control over the food supply, including the manufacture of food and its distribution, are discussed in a 1977 book entitled Food First.

One of the ways that can demonstrate the erroneous nature of the claim that insufficient food is currently grown or produced, is the immense volume of food wastage that occurs. The FAO web page entitled SAVE FOOD: Global Initiative on Food Loss and Waste Reduction states that,

"Every year around the globe 1.3 billion tonnes of food is lost or wasted, that is a 1/3 of all food produced for human consumption."

The 2030 Agenda proposes to address this problem; as can be seen by SDG 12.3, the aim of which is to,

"By 2030, halve per capita global food waste at the retail and consumer levels and reduce food losses along production and supply chains, including post-harvest losses."

It should be noted that the UN web page that describes 'progress and info' about SDG 12 states that,

"At the regional level, sub-Saharan Africa has the highest proportion of losses at 21.4 per cent, with food being lost in large quantities between the farm and retail levels."

This 'statistic', whether accurate or not, would seem to provide justification for yet more interventions into the food production and agriculture systems within Africa, where malnutrition is claimed to be a significant issue. Yet, African farmers have been successfully producing their own food using farming methods that have evolved and been developed over the course of hundreds if not thousands of years.

The problem is that it is not these methods, but those used by 'modern agriculture' that are neither beneficial nor sustainable. The reason is because 'modern agriculture' is based on industrialised food production on a huge scale and the perceived need for crops to be grown using a variety of synthetic chemicals as fertilisers, as well as toxic chemicals used as pesticides and herbicides. The industrialised manufacturing of 'food products' also requires a huge volume of synthetic and often toxic chemicals used as 'food additives'.

One method that has proven to be sustainable without the use of synthetic and toxic chemicals is known as Agroecology, which is defined in a Food First 'primer' document of the same name as the 'science of sustainable agriculture'; the document states,

"In sharp contrast to the proposal to industrialize all of the world's production systems with GMOs and monocultures, Agroecology demands diversification, small and medium land holdings and an emphasis on farming as a livelihood."

Furthermore, the primer also explains why this method will not be favoured by 'Big Ag',

"Instead of a steady concentration of wealth and monopoly power, agroecology works to decentralize and equitably distribute the power and wealth in our food systems."

Food production methods of this type demonstrate that the Earth can indeed provide a more than adequate supply of food to feed everyone, without the need for anyone to experience starvation.


Malnutrition is the topic of SDG 2.2 that states the aim to,

"By 2030, end all forms of malnutrition, including achieving, by 2025, the internationally agreed targets on stunting and wasting in children under 5 years of age, and address the nutritional needs of adolescent girls, pregnant and lactating women and older persons."

The June 2021 WHO fact sheet entitled Malnutrition claims that,

"Malnutrition, in all its forms, includes undernutrition (wasting, stunting, underweight), inadequate vitamins or minerals, overweight, obesity, and resulting diet-related noncommunicable diseases."

One of the organisations that claim to assist those suffering from malnutrition is the WFP, which provides this assistance through a number of programmes that involve the distribution of a variety of products, as indicated by the web page entitled Specialized nutritious food that states,

"The World Food Programme (WFP) uses a wide range of specialized foods to improve the nutritional intake of the people we assist around the world."

These products include: Fortified Blended Foods (FBFs); Ready-to-Use Foods (RUFs); High Energy Biscuits (HEBs); Micronutrient Powder or 'Sprinkles'; and Compressed Food Bars. The first products, called Fortified Blended Foods, are described on the web page as,

"…blends of partially precooked and milled cereals, soya, beans, pulses, fortified with micronutrients (vitamins and minerals)."

In other words, these are manufactured processed products, not fresh real foods that are genuinely nourishing. It is possible that such products may help in an emergency situation in the short-term, but they are not 'sustainable' nor can they possibly provide a long-term solution to the problem of malnutrition. They do, of course, ensure dependence on the products, which benefits those who control the manufacture and distribution of these 'products' as well as the 'aid' programmes that fund them. This dependence is almost invariably attached to conditions imposed by financial organisations such as the World Bank and IMF, whose policies can be shown to ensure that the vast majority of people remain in a state of poverty instead of helping to 'end poverty', which is the acclaimed 'aim' of SDG 1.

Unfortunately, there is an even more insidious aspect to efforts to 'end all forms of malnutrition', which is that an association has been made between malnutrition and 'infectious diseases'. This has led to the inevitable, but fallacious suggestion that even more vaccines are required; as can be seen by a September 2022 Science Direct article entitled Malnutrition vaccines for an imminent global food catastrophe that begins with the statement,

"Together with climate change, both the geopolitical events in Ukraine and social disruptions in supply chains from the COVID-19 pandemic could produce global food shortages or even mass starvation events. Promising new interventions include vaccines to prevent infectious causes of malnutrition or infections disproportionately causing death among the malnourished."

It must be emphasised that the claims in this statement are unfounded; there are no 'infectious diseases of malnutrition', despite the statement that,

"…in most of the world's low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), reduced nutritional intake does not occur in isolation. Chronic infections including diarrheal illness and parasitic infections accelerate both undernutrition and micronutrient-related malnutrition."

It would probably require an entire article to discuss the problems within that paper and demonstrate the absurd notion that vaccines can solve any of the problems related to 'malnutrition'; but it would be neither necessary nor useful to do so, because the theory on which vaccines are based has never been proven to be true. There are no 'infectious agents' that cause diseases that vaccines can help the body to protect itself against. It is of the utmost importance that people understand this fundamental point in view of the number of proposed new vaccines in development, as described within the article under the heading A new malnutrition vaccine portfolio,

"Based on the discussion in the preceding text, the major infectious and tropical diseases expected to amplify or exacerbate a pending food insecurity crisis, include three parasitic infections – human hookworm infection, schistosomiasis, and malaria; and two enteric bacterial infections – shigellosis and ST-ETEC, and tuberculosis."

It is abundantly clear that the article is based entirely on the theory that there are 'germs' of one sort or another that can 'infect' the body and cause gastrointestinal problems that result in symptoms such as diarrhoea. This theory, which remains unproven, represents a complete misunderstanding of how the human body actually functions and the purpose of symptoms. What is absolutely certain is that 'poor children', and even 'poor adults', who are malnourished and suffering from diarrhoea can never be healed through the use of toxic vaccines.

The reasons for the existence and persistence of the health problems associated with the labels listed in the study paper are many and varied; they include factors that relate to the condition of the environment in which people live. In some instances, this is due to the fact that the countries in which these conditions occur are still suffering the consequences of colonialism, despite gaining their independence during the 20th century. Another reason is the ongoing exploitation of resources within many African countries. The claim that there are 'outbreaks' of so-called 'transmissible diseases' therefore provides an excuse for 'vested interests' to justify their interventions that may include 'boots on the ground' operations involving personnel such as the EIS officers attached to the CDC for example.

In Summary

It is important for people to be aware that there is an 'agenda' and that the creators of this agenda seek to control every aspect of our lives for their benefit, not ours; and, more importantly, not for the stated reason of 'solving the world's problems'.

It is also important for people to be aware that we do face real problems, although they are not exactly the same as those contained within the 'agenda' documents.

It is possible to solve these problems, but the solutions can only arise as the result of genuine efforts to understand the real nature of those problems, which means that people need to understand that we have been lied to about almost every aspect of our lives. This in turn means that we need to question everything we have been and are being told about anything that has the potential to impact our lives; we must also question the word of 'experts', especially those promoted through the mainstream media; and increasingly, even the 'alternative' media.

Once we have begun to question what we are being told, we can start to understand the real nature of the problems and then create the appropriate solutions.


The purpose of this series of articles has not been to scare, but to empower everyone by providing information to help us all make informed decisions, rather than fear-driven ones.

We do have the power to change our lives; there are many people throughout the world who have already begun to create new ways of living based on co-operation rather than combat.

As R. Buckminster Fuller said,

"You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete."

The 'old model' is one that requires us to believe others rather than ourselves. The 'new model' requires us to recognise our inherent abilities and to each take back the responsibility for our own lives.

Dawn Lester
26th October 2022


Disease Madness Part 1 https://whatreallymakesyouill.com/disease-madness-what-is-happening-part-1/

Disease Madness Part 2 https://whatreallymakesyouill.com/disease-madness-what-is-happening-part-2/

The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development

Could 'Disease X' be just around the corner? Top professor warns Britain needs to 'strengthen' its preparations for possibility of a new pandemic amid outbreak of Covid, Monkeypox and Polio in the UK

WHO fact sheet Maternal mortality

NSSM 200

Food First

SAVE FOOD: Global Initiative on Food Loss and Waste Reduction

Food First primer Agroecology

WHO fact sheet Malnutrition

WFP Specialized nutritious food

Malnutrition vaccines for an imminent global food catastrophe

The post Disease Madness – What is Happening? Part 3 appeared first on What Really Makes You Ill.

What Really Makes You Ill
27 Sep 2022 | 3:44 pm

Nora Lenz and Dawn Lester discuss how veterinary practices and the pet food industry may be killing your pets.

In this important conversation, Nora and Dawn discuss some of the many problems within most veterinary practices and explain that the reason for this is because they are based on a misunderstanding of the dietary requirements of pet animals, with particular reference to dogs.

You can find Nora and her work at these links,


The Truth About "Parvo"



The post Nora Lenz and Dawn Lester discuss how veterinary practices and the pet food industry may be killing your pets. appeared first on What Really Makes You Ill.

What Really Makes You Ill
5 Sep 2022 | 12:18 pm

Our conversation with Drs Sam and Mark Bailey

In this highly enjoyable conversation with Sam and Mark Bailey, we discuss
* Our journey of awakening, including other books that influenced us
* The nature of reality
* Nutrition – plant based vs meat/dairy
* David's experience of vaccination
* Myth of the immune system
* Rift in the truther movement
and much more!

The post Our conversation with Drs Sam and Mark Bailey appeared first on What Really Makes You Ill.

What Really Makes You Ill
27 Aug 2022 | 5:15 pm

A great conversation with Steve Falconer of Spacebusters

We discuss nutrition and deficiencies, poisons and toxins, EMF toxicity, mental stress related illness, STD's, placebo, nocebo, pheromones, bio-resonance, morphogenetics, the biology of belief, New German Medicine, chemtrails, vaccines, "shedding", theoretical scientism and materialism, the paradigm awakening plus much more!

The post A great conversation with Steve Falconer of Spacebusters appeared first on What Really Makes You Ill.

What Really Makes You Ill
27 Aug 2022 | 2:24 pm

Our conference call conversation with Martin Bernstein for the Alliance of Living Liberators.

In this conversation, we discuss the lack of evidence for the existence of 'disease-causing viruses' and also the real causes of disease. In addition, we responded to a number of questions posed by some of the attendees of this conference call.

The post Our conference call conversation with Martin Bernstein for the Alliance of Living Liberators. appeared first on What Really Makes You Ill.

What Really Makes You Ill
25 Aug 2022 | 10:36 am

Dawn joins Adam again for a conversation about how the narrative is beginning to crumble.

In this wide-ranging and uplifting conversation, Adam explains that many prominent Australians are being exposed for their nefarious activities, which is helping people lose their faith in politics. Dawn refers to the encouraging news that more people are sceptical about the 'virus' narrative and so it is crumbling.

The post Dawn joins Adam again for a conversation about how the narrative is beginning to crumble. appeared first on What Really Makes You Ill.

What Really Makes You Ill
17 Aug 2022 | 3:47 pm

Adam talks to Dawn Lester for the 3rd time for the Crazz Files podcast

In this conversation Adam and Dawn break down and discuss some current media stories to show the depth of the lies we are told and also to expose how the narrative keeps changing to maintain the propaganda story and keep people in fear.

Dawn was also pleased to announce that The Light newspaper will be publishing their articles beginning with the July issue.

The post Adam talks to Dawn Lester for the 3rd time for the Crazz Files podcast appeared first on What Really Makes You Ill.

What Really Makes You Ill
13 Aug 2022 | 11:55 am

Our interview with Jeremy for Jerm Warfare

We had a great conversation with Jeremy Nell for his Jerm Warfare podcast in which we cover the reason it is so important for people to understand the problems with virology and the whole 'germ theory'.

The post Our interview with Jeremy for Jerm Warfare appeared first on What Really Makes You Ill.

website no use cookies, no spying, no tracking
to use the website, we check:
country: US · city: North · ip:
device: computer · browser: CCBot 2 · platform:
counter: 1 · online:
created and powered by:
RobiYogi.com - Professional Responsive Websites
 please wait loading data...