A Farewell To Virology

Virology has invented a model of the virus, but has never been able to meet its own requirements. Viruses are thought to cause disease after transmission between hosts, such as humans, but scientific evidence for this claim is lacking. One of the biggest failures of virology has been the inability to obtain virus particles directly from the tissues of organisms said to suffer from 'viral' diseases. In order to obfuscate this, virologists have resorted to creating their own pseudo-scientific methods to replace the well-established scientific method, and to changing the meaning of words in the dictionary to support their anti-scientific practices. For example,

A virus particle must meet certain physical and biological properties, including being an intracellular parasite capable of replicating and causing disease in a host, such as a human. However, 'viruses' such as SARS-CoV-2 are nothing more than phantom constructs, existing only in the imagination and computer simulations. In this paradigm, cases of invented diseases such as COVID-19 are nothing more than the detection of genetic sequences and selected proteins considered to be 'viral'. The existence of a virus is not necessary in this circular reasoning and therefore entire 'pandemics' can be constructed based on digital creations and falsely supported by in vitro ('test tube') molecular reactions.

The first part presents the history of virology and the inability of virologists to apply the scientific method. It can be shown that the numerous and widespread claims of virologists are false for the following reasons: (a) the lack of direct evidence and (b) the invalidation of indirect 'evidence' due to the uncontrolled nature of the experiments [c.e. say the lack of counter-experiments or control experiments]. The examples given cover all major aspects of viral fraud, including so-called isolation, cytopathic effects, genomics, antibodies and animal pathogenicity studies.

Part two examines the fraud used to spread the Covid-19 'pandemic'. An analysis of the methodology used by the original inventors, Fan Wu et al, shows how the fictitious SARS-CoV-2 virus was 'created' using anti-science methods and language tricks. This is part of an ongoing fraud whereby viruses are pretended to exist by modelling them on previous models of 'viruses'. If we take the example of SARS-CoV-2, the trail of genomic models of the 'coronavirus' from the 1980s shows that none of these genetic sequences have ever been shown to originate from within the virus particle - the phylogenetic trees are fantasies .

The third section examines how some key players, 'health' institutions and the mainstream media maintain the illusion of a virus by controlling the information and narratives that repeat the claims of virology. Coincidentally, the virology hoax is now at the centre of the COVID-19 hoax. From there, however, it can be critically assessed by those outside virology, and the pseudo-scientific paradigm that virology has built around itself can ultimately be dismantled and discarded. The aim of this essay is to refute the various claims that pathogenic viruses exist and cause disease. SARS-CoV-2 is used as the main example, but the principles apply to all so-called viruses. The often obscure virological literature is discussed below on its own terms, which, it must be admitted, can make reading some parts of this essay a little difficult. However, it is hoped that this contribution will fill a gap for the reader seeking a more technical understanding of the viral hypothesis, as it seeks to reveal the basis of so-called pandemics and fraudulent medical practices. The threat that virology poses to humanity continues to grow. It is therefore time to say goodbye to these destructive pseudoscientific practices and to free ourselves from unnecessary fears. may make reading some parts of this essay difficult.

However, it is hoped that this contribution will fill a gap for the reader seeking a more technical understanding of the virus hypothesis, as it seeks to reveal the basis of so-called pandemics and fraudulent medical practices.

The threat that virology poses to humanity continues to grow.It is therefore time to say goodbye to these destructive pseudoscientific practices and to free ourselves from unnecessary fears. may make reading some parts of this essay difficult.However, it is hoped that this contribution will fill a gap for the reader seeking a more technical understanding of the viral hypothesis, as it seeks to expose the basis of so-called pandemics and fraudulent medical practices.The threat that virology poses to humanity continues to grow.It is therefore time to say goodbye to these destructive pseudo-scientific practices and free ourselves from unnecessary fears.The threat that virology poses to humanity continues to grow.It is therefore time to say goodbye to these destructive pseudo-scientific practices and to free ourselves from unnecessary fears. The threat that virology poses to humanity continues to grow. It is therefore time to say goodbye to these destructive pseudo-scientific practices and free ourselves from unnecessary fears.