en

New COVID at-home test dangerous and misleading: but everybody’s doing it, so who cares, right?

by Jon Rappoport on Jon Rappoport

Recently, I've been writing fiction, satire, parody, to expose the insanity of the pandemic scam. This article is not that. This article is fact. Buckle up.

Since the beginning of the so-called pandemic, I've been attacking the value of the PCR diagnostic test from many angles. The primary angle, as my readers know, is: SARS-CoV-2 was never isolated, never proved to exist.

However, I've also ventured into the bubble world where a few billion people blindly accept the existence of the virus-and I've shown that even within that world, the internal contradictions and lies abound.

One again, now, I'm entering that bubble world, since the powers-that-be are widely promoting the use of an at-home test for the "virus." This test is self-administered. No doctor, nurse, or technician is present. What could possibly go wrong, as millions of people perform the test on themselves?

Well, let's lead off with DANGER.

The reference is an undated FDA document titled, "BinaxNOWTM COVID-19 Antigen Self TEST." The Binax test kit is manufactured by Abbott.

Here is the key quote: "The Reagent Solution [included in the test kit] contains a harmful chemical (see table below). If the solution contacts the skin or eye, flush with copious amounts of water. If irritation persists, seek medical advice…"

Then the FDA document lists that harmful chemical: sodium azide.

Just how harmful is it?

For an answer, let's look at a CDC document titled, "Facts About Sodium Azide." We find this statement:

"Sodium azide is a rapidly acting, potentially deadly chemical that exists as an odorless white solid."

Then there is this: "Sodium azide prevents the cells of the body from using oxygen. When this happens, the cells die. Sodium azide is more harmful to the heart and the brain than to other organs, because the heart and the brain use a lot of oxygen."

Yes, as with all poisons, the degree of damage depends on the dosage, but you decide whether "potentially deadly," as the CDC describes sodium azide, signifies a significant risk.

If you read the FDA document I referenced above, you'll see that the reagent containing sodium azide is involved in the self-administered COVID test, and the whole test procedure is complex enough to allow fumbles and mistakes-such as a spill of the "deadly chemical."

Don't believe me? Try this FDA quote on for size: "To perform the test, an anterior nasal swab specimen is collected by the patient, then 6 drops of extraction reagent from a dropper bottle are added to the top hole of the swab well. The patient sample is inserted into the test card through the bottom hole of the swab well, and firmly pushed upwards until the swab tip is visible through the top hole. The swab is rotated 3 times clockwise and the card is closed, bringing the extracted sample into contact with the test strip. Test results are interpreted visually at 15 minutes based on the presence or absence of visually detectable pink/purple colored lines."

See what I mean? Good luck.

Now let's move on to the second problem with this at-home self-performed COVID test: it's grossly misleading. The results are ambiguous.

The FDA document I've been quoting contains this gem: "The BinaxNOW COVID-19 Antigen Self Test does not differentiate between SARS-CoV and SARS…CoV-2."

BOOM. In other words, a positive test, indicating infection, could mean nothing more than infection with the 2003 "SARS virus"-and that "epidemic" was a dud. But wait, there's more:

"Positive results do not rule out bacterial infection or co-infection with other viruses. The agent detected may not be the definite cause of disease."

Double trouble. The person who tests positive could simply be housing bacteria in his body, AND whatever germ the test is detecting may not even be causing disease.

Other than that, the at-home test is perfect.

This Abbott BinaxNow at-home COVID test is the market leader. About 75% of all retail test-kit sales in the US come from Abbott.

Back in the early spring of 2020, I told you the test was the key to faking the pandemic. Now the government wants the population to perform the test-fakery on themselves. With, of course, the added danger of exposing themselves to a highly destructive chemical in the process.

But don't worry, be happy. On many days of every week, little Tony Fauci will appear on television and inform you that testing is necessary, and he'll omit grisly details. Trust him.

And then march forward, secure in the knowledge that lies and omissions keep us safe.

  • 10 comments
    last comments from Jon Rappoport
    jane mariouw 7 Jan 2022 | 4:44 am

    thank you for speaking out!

    jane mariouw 7 Jan 2022 | 4:31 am

    excellent idea!

    RM 6 Jan 2022 | 2:45 am

    Sodium azide is not a "potentially" deadly chemical. A couple of grams of it will do you in, every time. It's touted as a reliable means of killing yourself by a Dutch suicide-advocacy organization.

    sk 4 Jan 2022 | 7:12 pm

    Like a fruit, Kleenex probably causes a positive result. Or your theory; it's really not about what they they are trying to extract, but what they want to insert.

    RegretLeft 3 Jan 2022 | 8:40 pm

    Thanks to all who replied. NeedALadder made me think most. I would respond, I have my red lines which I have quietly stood behind and not budged. That grossly invasive procedure at a pubic "test center" is such. A going-thru-the-motions-privately at home test is fuzzy in that regard. For now, we are in a soft-shutdown at work (to flatten the curve) and I remain non-compliant.

    JR today (Jan 3) says the narrative is crumbling; the NFL two weeks ago said they were stopping asymptomatic testing. As I said, my non-compliance is quiet at this time.

    CG 2 Jan 2022 | 8:34 am

    I refused to take the test that involves a small brush tipped stick that is dipped into a clear liquid before inserting in nostral rotated several times. I believe it causes the thin membrane to rupture to allow the solution to enter body.

    If it is only the nasal mucas that is required for testing, I asked if I could blow my nose into a kleenex so they could get the mucas for sampling that way.

    They refused. This test was mandatory to authorize my outpatient procedure in the next 3 days.

    Why can't they test from mucas on a kleenex I think we all know the answers.

    J.Barlow 2 Jan 2022 | 2:42 am

    No viruses whatsoever. They don't exist except on computers. Viruses were invented to sell dodgy vaccines which have done more harm than wars. Without vaccines there would be no cancer, cot deaths, Alzheimers, autism, Gulf War syndrome, Gardasil adverse reactions, schizophrenia, Tourette's syndrome, chronic fatigue syndrome, fibromyalgia, expressive aphasia, impaired speech skills, attention deficit disorders, silent ischemic strokes, obesity, idiopathic thrombocytopenia purpura, Parkinson's disease, and other modern neurodevelopmental disorders.

    Zucker 1 Jan 2022 | 6:53 pm

    Yes. You do. Don't ask me how I know this… But you can perform the test without stuffing it up your nose, spitting on the stick or anything else… And get a negative test.

    drewdall 1 Jan 2022 | 5:43 pm

    I am a big fan of the late David Crowe's work and it's tragic that he his not around to give more balanced insight.

    I'm inclined to agree with you about 5G, but even Crowe, in that article, concedes that 'There are also concerns with certain high frequencies resonating with functions in the human body. This is also worth investigating.'

    I find this interesting in the light of what Spanish investigator La Quinta Columna (see Orwell City for English translations) are researching with regards to allegations of Graphene Oxide in the jabs (both Covid AND previous flu shots) and how EMF might have an impact.

    AB 1 Jan 2022 | 5:39 pm

    'I WILL NOT COMPLY' and more Songs of RESISTANCE Against the Covid Dystopia – 2022 Music Playlist! Let's END the 'Covid' Scam in 2022, Together!

    https://sarasotavaccinationchoice.wordpress.com/covid-vaxx-lockdown-protest-songs/

  • write comment

This material is distributed without profit for research and educational purposes.
The views expressed are solely those of the authors or commentators and may or may not reflect those of Radios.cz.

Text to Speech by: ResponsiveVoice-NonCommercial licensed under 95x15
website no use cookies, no spying, no tracking
to use the website, we check:
country: US · city: Columbus · ip: 18.219.22.169
device: computer · browser: AppleWebKit 537 · platform:
counter: 1 · online:
created and powered by:
RobiYogi.com - Professional Responsive Websites
00:00
00:00
close
 please wait loading data...