en

Freedom exists Outside society

by Jon Rappoport on Jon Rappoport

Sanity: "Freedom exists within the individual. It doesn't exist anywhere else. Freedom means choice. An individual either takes it or surrenders it."

Mind control: "We all live inside the government. The first fact of existence is, we live inside SOMETHING."

That is a lie.

As the worldwide freedom protests against COVID restrictions expand, I'm reminding people of a few basic truths-after decades of press and government brainwashing.

Freedom, of course, is a natural fact, beyond the need for government permission.

It exists outside the TERRITORY of government.

No, we don't live inside the government.

The truth is even more extreme. Freedom exists outside of society.

Society is not an entity that encircles and surrounds freedom.

Society is an organization. Freedom isn't organized.

Heinous slogans like, "We're all in this together," are meant to redefine society, and give the impression that we naturally exist INSIDE it.

We don't.

"We're all in this together" is a tribal maxim. Even there, it's a con, because the tribal leaders use it to enforce loyalty and submission.

When you know that, you know a great deal about freedom protests and government pushback.

The government is saying, "You ALREADY EXIST within OUR territory. To protect you and keep you safe, we're restricting you. Naturally, you'll comply. If you don't, you're a criminal. If you persist in your non-compliance, you're a terrorist. You're an insurrectionist."

That's a fantasy cooked up by the government. Ultimately, on the physical level, it's enforced by government personnel with weapons. That's how it becomes real.

The major everyday strategy the government uses is the proposition, "Everybody lives and works and thinks inside society, and society is regulated by the government. Society is the primary fact every person is born with."

That's a lie.

Every person is born with the knowledge that he is here and alive-an individual. THAT is primary.

Regardless of what he needs and requires to survive, those needs do not define him. They come second, not first.

Of course, some potato head will take this as an "anti-family" statement. It isn't. But the love within a family has no meaning unless it's understood that each family member is an individual.

A person can live in freedom without limit-but the basic law of an open society is: he is responsible (for his actions), and he can't lessen the freedom of another. Granted. However, that legal restriction doesn't define what freedom is. It modifies it. It comes second, not first.

Mind control puts everything backwards. What comes first is placed second, and vice versa.

The individual, who is free, exists outside society and government, and always has. He enters society, but he doesn't start out inside it. He enters and exits.

Once that is clear, everything changes.

This is more than the issue of who physically owns space…

This is, who THINKS of space as open and who thinks of space as closed.

The space of government and the space of society are not the space of freedom.

EVERY CRIMINAL KNOWS THIS.

But the criminal violates the basic law of society by diminishing the freedom of others.

When the rest of the population is so cowed and brainwashed that it doesn't even know what the criminal knows, we're cooked.

The crazed government of Canada is in a panic because the people are waking up to the fact that freedom exists outside the government, and the truckers have suddenly become a potent force that performs instant surgery on mind control and lops it off.

Space: the final frontier. And it's open, not closed. It's not inside the government or society. It's outside.

A reasonable society is a society where real debate can take place.

An open society is asymmetrical and unresolved. It isn't perfect. It doesn't strive for perfection, and it doesn't strive for unity. Unity is a con.

When an individual ENTERS the space of an unfree society, he declares the ability to act without limit, with responsibility, on the sole condition that he doesn't diminish the freedom of another. The individual fights for that right.

But freedom itself is not enclosed within society or government. That is a fiction promoted by those men who would own government and society and force unity on all of us. The unity of compliance.

Freedom, in its essence, is non-material. It exists within the individual. It is choice. The individual either exercises it or surrenders it.

  • 10 comments
    last comments from Jon Rappoport
    Jim S Smith 27 Feb 2022 | 2:16 am

    – "There can be NO free-society, where the People are not also able to voluntarily leave it."

    – "Government is not reason. It is force, and like fire – is a dangerous servant and a fearful master."

    Will Smith 25 Feb 2022 | 12:57 am

    Elizabeth you started a conversation that needs to be continued, your quote is indeed correct, but shortly after birth a process called a Birth Certificate is created that implies consent was granted to "volunteer" to become a legal fiction as someone else suggested. Somebody mentioned prior about the "Strawman" which is an embodiment of the legal fiction. So apparently slavery or involuntary servitude was abolished, but what if they get you to "volunteer" to be a slave. By that process they have you by contract.

    How do they do that?

    Take a look at all your documents that you have. Any government document, drivers license, credit cards, utility bills, anything with your name. What do they all have in common? Your name is in all capital letters. Must be a mistake? No, not so much. What they did was turn you into a corporation to facilitate commerce with the government which as you pointed out, is a commercial entity.

    Commerce is trade between corporations. Since the government is a corporation they only way they can have any influence over you because you agreed to be a slave when the birth certificate was registered. They just didn't tell you so you would keep playing their little game not knowing how to get off the ride. Turns out anything with all caps letters is either: 1) A ship on the seas (Admiralty jurisdiction) 2) a corporation (a dead legal fiction, a corpse; get it? 3) a dead person. Go to any cemetery what do all the residents headstones have in common? Their names are all in all caps letters which signifies that they are deceased. A corpse, no longer alive. So through the birth certificate there are things they didn't tell you, like you agreed to a contract that binds you to involuntary servitude. You agreed to be a slave with the birth certificate bond and contract.

    So how do we join the living? Rebut the assumption and presumption that you agreed to this arrangement. You didn't and that is what makes it criminally fraud because a binding contract requires that BOTH parties expressly agree to the terms and there must be something called full disclosure of the terms of the contract. Think of it as the "fine print" that we all dislike about contracts. Without full disclosure of the terms and conditions of the agreement, the contract is void because fraud vitiates all contracts. Poof…

    Well that is what is supposed to happen in commerce and there are plenty of legal practitioners that toil for currency to review it all. As a corporation providing "government services" what we think of as government is really no different as a corporation, than Dairy Queen. Really it's sort of that simple, they no more right to influence us than Walmart. But they don't tell you that and people don't really go looking for it unless the get red-pilled like this.

    So go looking for it. The truth really will set you free.

    Tracy Kolenchuk 24 Feb 2022 | 12:52 am

    Interesting, but also consider this, to quote Arlo Guthrie, you can't have dark without a light to stick it in,"

    Freedom is freedom from community constraints – which might be familial, tribal, religious, or any of many layers of corporate or government constraints.

    When an individual is not a part of any community we might view them as without "constraints" but they are not "free from any specific constraints" because no constraints exist. They are not free from the rule of any communities because there are no constraints to be free from. Adam, alone in the garden, might be described as "free" but because there were no constraints to be free of.

    The battle for freedom is the battle to build communityies, to build constraints.

    When big corporations rule, we lose freedom because we are not free to develop independent communities – small and large – which create and live by different rules. That's freedom.

    SharineWonders 23 Feb 2022 | 11:49 pm

    William, I love that quote and will start using it immediately. Thank you for sharing it!

    SharineWonders 23 Feb 2022 | 11:48 pm

    Right on, Laura! I'm with you on all your points. The protests are useless except to the black magicians and their career clowns who, as you said, LAUGH at the protestors

    I do not wear a Satanic ritual humiliation/conversion muzzle. If a store employee cannot understand that "there is no law" and they become belligerent, I leave and spend my money elsewhere. But I always inform the management and owners in writing that they are operating OUTSIDE OF THE LAW, and that the man-made laws exist to AFFIRM our Creator-given, unalienable rights. No one can confer rights to or remove them from another man or woman: Rights are inherent in our divine beingness!

    Jimmy 23 Feb 2022 | 10:35 pm

    "…the govt is laughing at these protests.."

    Actually, they're not. The governments of the world are terrified by these protests, which is why they are doubling down on the absurdity. They know the whole game is coming unravelled, and they are desperate.

    Give up if you want; go hide in a corner and weep, many will continue to fight the good fight.

    Tim_2A 23 Feb 2022 | 10:26 pm

    Excellent!

    Without having read this posting, I was speaking yesterday with a friend whose husband is an active duty soldier, and it was difficult to convey to her exactly what it was that made freedom impossible, under or within the current regime and/or system in which we find ourselves.

    You explained it better than I had, and I will send her this posting.

    Thank you, Jon.

    Tim_2A 23 Feb 2022 | 10:14 pm

    "Canadian," of course.

    Tim_2A 23 Feb 2022 | 10:12 pm

    For the sake of the slave-keepers of the Canandian government, it is EXTREMELY fortunate that (nearly) ALL subjects of their ubiquitous tyranny ARE DISARMED.

    Elizabeth 23 Feb 2022 | 9:53 pm

    Just read "MEET YOUR STRAWMAN AND WHATEVER YOU WANT TO KNOW". I quote, "All humans are born equal, with complete freedom of choice."

    Check out the Government of Canada on Dun & Bradstreet to begin to understand that this is a commercial entity.

  • write comment

This material is distributed without profit for research and educational purposes.
The views expressed are solely those of the authors or commentators and may or may not reflect those of Radios.cz.

Text to Speech by: ResponsiveVoice-NonCommercial licensed under 95x15
website no use cookies, no spying, no tracking
to use the website, we check:
country: US · city: Columbus · ip: 18.219.22.169
device: computer · browser: AppleWebKit 537 · platform:
counter: 1 · online:
created and powered by:
RobiYogi.com - Professional Responsive Websites
00:00
00:00
close
 please wait loading data...